Medical Marijuana - 7 Advocates Saying It Should Be Legal

While there are arguments on both parties in the debate, medical marijuana has several key advocates giving it a significant number of credibility.

1. Consumer Reports - The business has said that individuals that are struggling with AIDS or some type of terminal cancer, the benefits are given by the drug seem to become more significant than some of the risks, either the ones that are substantiated or the ones that are even suspected. Additionally, they argued that, for exactly the same reason the FDA is quick to approve new cancer medications, they ought to also be lenient with the use of medical marijuana dr Oklahoma for people who are terminally ill.

2. American College of Physicians - The ACP doesn't strongly argue in favor of the advantages of medical marijuana, however, they do argue so it shouldn't be classified as a schedule I controlled substance. They argue there are circumstances by which it could be effective, and it is relatively safe in comparison to other drugs with exactly the same classification. They most strongly argue for legal protection for oklahoma medical marijuana physicians recommending it or patients taking it on a recommendation.

3. Jocelyn Elders, MD - Elders claims that the herbal remedy is less toxic than lots of the drugs prescribed by doctors on a regular basis. She also claims that there's "overwhelming" evidence showing it is able to ease the apparent symptoms of certain types of nausea, pain, and vomiting. It is especially necessary for people coping with cancer, AIDS, and multiple sclerosis, or the medications that they use to deal with these diseases.

4. Donald Abrams, MD - In the Annals of Internal Medicine, Abrams stated that AIDS patients who had either smoked marijuana or used the medication in a pill feature a more efficient immune system than those who had used a phony version of the medication. Along with this, they apparently had a better appetite, because they gained, on average, four more pounds than those who were taking the false version.

5. Judge Francis L. Young - Young is a DEA Administrative Law Judge. He stated that the DEA shouldn't prevent folks from benefiting from the beneficial aftereffects of medical marijuana if they were in need of it. He stated that the 9-6-88 ruling clearly demonstrated several great things about cannabis as a medical drug.

6. Gregory T. Carter, MD - Carter argues that Marinol isn't a substitute for marijuana, which contains several substances other compared to THC that Marinol is designed to simulate.

7. Lester Grinspoon, MD - On the risks of the drug's use, Grinspoon of the Harvard Medical School stated that the proof of marijuana's supposed health threats is lacking. Whilst the drug has been smoked widely throughout Western civilization for a lot more than four decades, he noted that there hasn't been a single case linking the use of marijuana to lung cancer or emphysema.